MEMENTO VIVERE Episode 4 [February 2022]
In the last episode, we saw that the harmful actions that go against Natural Law, were all based in theft.
Stealing someone else's property results in harming another being, which is incorrect, which is wrong. Is there an objective difference between right and wrong? A WRONG action does not align with the laws of the Universe (Natural Law).
A wrong action is INCORRECT, and IMMORAL. A wrong action causes harm to another sentient being. WRONG ACTIONS BRING WRONG RESULTS.
A RIGHT action is aligned with the laws of the Universe (Natural Law). A right action is CORRECT, and MORAL. A right action causes no harm to another sentient being.
RIGHT ACTIONS BRING RIGHT RESULTS.
A right is an action that does not cause harm to another being. Right and wrongs are not human being's invention. Human beings do not arbitrate them according to time, location circumstances or preference. Rights can never become wrongs and wrongs can never become rights. At any place or time, regardless of how many people believe or wish it to be so.
In Truth and Reality, Morality is Objective.
"The law of absolute right stipulates that people think, say and do what is logically and morally right, or they will incur wrong, unwanted results. [...] Everybody's obedience to all the natural laws of the material world would prevent any expressions of wrongness. That would mean a life free from conflict caused by pressure and resistance. That would mean individual and world peace as people stopped fighting to get the advantage. That would mean true equality for all disparate groups. That would also mean the eventual irrelevancy of manmade laws to control people's behaviour and the costly legal systems for trying to enforce those laws. [...] Natural Law makes it clear that right action cannot produce wrong results." - Richard W.Wetherill
Read more books from Richard W. Wetherill: https://www.alphapub.com/our-books
Doriane
Stealing someone else's property results in harming another being, which is incorrect, which is wrong. Is there an objective difference between right and wrong? A WRONG action does not align with the laws of the Universe (Natural Law).
A wrong action is INCORRECT, and IMMORAL. A wrong action causes harm to another sentient being. WRONG ACTIONS BRING WRONG RESULTS.
A RIGHT action is aligned with the laws of the Universe (Natural Law). A right action is CORRECT, and MORAL. A right action causes no harm to another sentient being.
RIGHT ACTIONS BRING RIGHT RESULTS.
A right is an action that does not cause harm to another being. Right and wrongs are not human being's invention. Human beings do not arbitrate them according to time, location circumstances or preference. Rights can never become wrongs and wrongs can never become rights. At any place or time, regardless of how many people believe or wish it to be so.
In Truth and Reality, Morality is Objective.
"The law of absolute right stipulates that people think, say and do what is logically and morally right, or they will incur wrong, unwanted results. [...] Everybody's obedience to all the natural laws of the material world would prevent any expressions of wrongness. That would mean a life free from conflict caused by pressure and resistance. That would mean individual and world peace as people stopped fighting to get the advantage. That would mean true equality for all disparate groups. That would also mean the eventual irrelevancy of manmade laws to control people's behaviour and the costly legal systems for trying to enforce those laws. [...] Natural Law makes it clear that right action cannot produce wrong results." - Richard W.Wetherill
Read more books from Richard W. Wetherill: https://www.alphapub.com/our-books
Doriane