In recent years, while the public health system pushes for a precedent of compulsory vaccines claiming ‘safe & effective,’ many have rightfully questioned just how safe or effective these prophylactic technologies actually are. It is not the result of merely just information on the internet, but usually first-hand testimony from people they know who's child or family member has been affected. I have been covering this topic for a while, and have laid out many of the risks, vulnerabilities, and failures that can result with a vaccine. In this article, I want to show very clearly how most injuries can go unaccounted for and continue without any backlash to pharmaceutical firms or the public health system while the majority of the population is kept in total ignorance.
Imagine if I told you that once a vaccine hits the market, most of the injuries that occur will not be accounted for or added back into the science data on the safety of the vaccine? Using highly specific, limited definitions of what a vaccine injury consists of in the eyes of the public health system, it usually falls in the realm of allergic reactions and a robust immune response that produce such obvious outcomes that it simply cannot be ignored, but this is typically such a small number, and no doubt why the adverse reactions are considered rare in the data versus what happens in reality.[1] [2]
As I’ve mentioned and cited in other articles, low-level neuroinflammation is a much more common effect of para-infectious processes but the definition of inflammation in modern medicine has not been setup to include it, so it goes undiagnosed:
Many neurotropic viruses exist and may cause classical inflammation but also low-level neuroinflammation. However, viruses may be dormant within the CNS and become active later. The role of neurotropic virus infections in the causation of psychiatric disorders may be underestimated, because the diagnostic approach to the CNS is difficult and to dormant infections in general, but especially within the CNS. Evidence is increasing that infections increase the risk of psychiatric disorders, not only prenatal infections but also infections during the lifetime. The question how low level neuroinflammation may be involved in severe psychiatric disorders like affective and schizophrenic spectrum disorders is intriguing but remains to be studied. Experimental data clearly show that low-level neuroinflammation can be induced by viruses, but the definitions of inflammation and low level neuroinflammation appear to be blurred and apparently the previous classical definition of inflammation has to be widened. Virus infection itself or virus-related products or virus-induced autoimmunity may play a role in disease pathogenesis. More sensitive diagnostic approaches from neuroimaging and CSF investigations may hold the key to a better understanding and definition of CNS viral infections as an etiopathogenetic subgroup of severe psychiatric disorders.[3]
Many adverse reactions fall in the range of immunosuppression and the symptoms associated with it are usually non-specific, like headache, malaise, fatigue, joint and body pain, and so on.[4] Immune tolerance is the much more common effect, but they do not consider immune tolerance and chronic health problems as definable diseases, but rather they claim the initial flu-like reaction that follows a vaccine is a healthy reaction. However, many of the chronic diseases out there begin with flu-like symptoms, only to develop progressive neurodegenerative diseases that can relapse and remit with permanent damage on the immune system, persistent and chronic health problems that are not recognized in clinical medical evaluations, scans, or diagnostics.[5]
It is unfortunate that most of the anti-vaccine movement is mostly focused on metal adjuvants only, while the reality is much more sinister and destructive. Microbial, fungal, parasitic, and viral contamination can leave lasting, permanent health problems, and worse, viral contaminants can degrade a bloodline to affect future generations in terrifying ways.[6] This was noted in a mouse model by Erich Traub in the late 1930s with a virus called Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus (LCM),[7] which served as an animal model of the human herpesviruses like Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6).[8] The virus would pass down generations giving rise to chronic disease, neurodegeneration, and cancers like lymphomatosis and leukemia.[9]When any form of toxemia or trauma occurs in the body and bloodstream, latent viruses can be reactivated and cause systemic health problems.[10] [11] Such health problems can play out in infinite variation with general similarities and the result is usually of a non-specific nature.[12]
It usually takes some kind of crisis to impose tyranny, and I do believe there are several plagues spreading in the United States, transmitted in various ways, as the history of biological warfare I have covered will show. However, the public health response is incompetent and both harmful and immoral. The vaccines that public health is attempting to force on us can come with some serious drawbacks, permanent damages and injuries that will not be compensated or factored into the vaccine data when the injuries occur,[13] and they have been occurring, many of which go under the radar, unacknowledged and even covered up.[14]
I do believe viruses and transmissible diseases exist and have been with us since the beginning of recorded history. I am not on the same page as the now-popular alternative health paradigm saying viruses don’t exist or being mistaken as exosomes, even though some viruses seem to hijack the exosomal pathways.[15] My research shows viruses are real and do exist and cause severe health problems,[16] many have been purified,[17] synthesized and replicate in cell-free extracts of HeLa cells which do not produce exosomes,[18] and I think some of these currently popular alternative health practitioners and their understanding of the nature of disease and immunology is completely incorrect, and typical of New Age alternative health paradigms where everything is a toxin that needs to be expelled.[19] Like the mainstream medical fields, profit also drives the alternative health fields.
That being said, I also do not agree with public health authoritarianism. Immoral, forced public health responses that restrict our ability to breathe oxygen or be coerced into having unknown, risky substances injected into our body is wrong no matter what, and that is at the core of the matter.[20] [21] My research shows vaccines can be as horrible and cause more systemic health problems than the plagues they claim to fight. I have published several articles in this realm, such as Tainted Immunity: Post-Vaccinal Encephalitis & the Chronic Plague of Societal Degeneration, Medical Misanthropology: A Tale of Vaccination, Mental Illness, & Clinical Psychiatry, Immune Tolerance and Slow-Virus Disease: Skeletons in the Closet of Western Public Health. and some of these aspects have been discussed in The Special Virus-Cancer Program (SVCP): Engineering an Abomination of Science and Public Health, Invasive Immunization: BARDA, Vectored Vaccines, Oxitec Mosquitoes, & Morgellon's Disease Origins. Much of the inner mechanics of vaccines and the ways in which they can harm are discussed in the first few aforementioned articles, and immune tolerance is one of the major tenets of all chronic disease, that is, immunosuppression and the soul-sucking fatigue caused by suppressed immune systems.[22] Our immune systems are not just for fighting disease. Our immune systems also hold our vitality and vigor. Systematically burning out the immune systems of any given population will come with systemic adverse effects that degenerate the brain, productivity, mental health, and overall well-being.[23] It will replace acute disease with slow, chronic ones, accompanied with serious neurotropic effects that inhibit all functions of the brain and central nervous system (CNS).[24]
As the COVID-19 vaccine is rolled out across the Western world, the public health system's reassurance to the public on the safety profiles of this vaccine is using incompetent surveillance and reporting systems. Furthermore, drug firms and special interest groups can and do manipulate data and clinical trials to effectively push a vaccine through as safe & effective, even when they are not.[25] One example is the LYMErix vaccine that was put on the market in 1998, only to be pulled from the market in 2001.[26] The FDA hearings had testimony from many who had been injured by the vaccine, and these injuries were debilitating and permanent, especially after the second shot.[27] The schemes used in setting up clinical trials can be very complex, just like an overseas intelligence operation can be, and profit-motivated. The surveillance system used to collect data on its real-time safety on the field is setup to fail and the injuries that occur once the vaccine hits the market are not being factored back into the data used by public health or science.[28] Few in the public health system are speaking up or saying anything about it even though many are aware of the issue.
In recent weeks, The New York Times article appeared on February 12, 2021, titled As Millions Get Shots, F.D.A. Struggles to Get Safety Monitoring System Running. This was describing the current situation on the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the experimental COVID-19 vaccine. Many who read the article may not understand or follow the significance and seriousness of what the article implies, because few are aware of what the monitoring system consists of, or what the lack of an effective monitoring system means to the average person or the integrity of information as it relates to science. This is because few know what the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is and how its failure ensures and maintains injuries will not get factored into the science or public health data.[29] This is not a new problem. It has allowed millions of children to sustain vaccine-injuries without any acknowledgement by the public health system or drug firms. It is nothing less than free rein on the health and well-being of children and everyday people, who are lied to with insufficient data on the safety of any given vaccine or biopharmaceutical. The article begins:
"More than 35 million Americans have received Covid vaccines, but the much-touted system the government designed to monitor any dangerous reactions won’t be capable of analyzing safety data for weeks or months, according to numerous federal health officials.
For now, federal regulators are counting on a patchwork of existing programs that they acknowledge are inadequate because of small sample size, missing critical data or other problems."[30]
Here is the backbone of the so-called monitoring system used to assess this experimental vaccine:
"The government is now relying most on a 30-year-old safety monitoring system that the F.D.A. shares with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and a new smartphone app that people who get vaccinated can download and use to report problems if they wish. The C.D.C. also runs the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a collaboration between the agency and nine health systems that collects vaccine data and electronic medical records of roughly 12 million patients. Although it is well-regarded, it is of limited use because of its small size."[31]
What is this 30-year-old safety monitoring system? The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS):
"So far, few serious problems have been reported through these channels and no deaths have conclusively been linked to the vaccines. The 30-year-old initiative, known as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, relies on self-reported cases from patients and health care providers."[32]
It might seem secure enough to the average citizen, since most would think all of those injured by the vaccine can report their injuries back through VAERS and the public health system will report the data back to reflect the science, but in reality, nothing like this occurs or is even attempted.[33] The reporting system serves as nothing more than a public commenting hotline. You can claim the vaccine caused this or that injury, but since vaccine injuries are typically variable and cause non-specific reactions, they will oftentimes go unacknowledged.[34] Since doctors are not taught to spot such injuries, many of which that cause immunosuppressive effects that are not picked up on scans and tests, getting any proof of a vaccine injury by these antigenic stimuli is like a needle in a haystack and nearly impossible.[35]
Therefore, neither the FDA nor the CDC will take any reported injury as anything more than an unsubstantiated claim, and an unsubstantiated claim will not be factored into the science or data. They will not even follow up on the reported injuries in any way that can effectively be factored back into the science. The only possible way any reconsideration is given to such vaccine injuries once they hit the market is if the same claim is made in unusually large numbers. The VAERS system states:
VAERS scientists look for unusually high numbers of reports of an adverse event after a particular vaccine or a new pattern of adverse events. If scientists see either of these situations, focused studies in other systems are done to determine if the adverse event is or is not a side effect of the vaccine. Information from VAERS and vaccine safety studies is shared with the public. Throughout the process of monitoring VAERS, conducting studies, and sharing findings, appropriate actions are taken to protect the public’s health.
For example, if VAERS identifies a mild adverse event that is verified as a side effect in a focused study, this information is reviewed by CDC, FDA, and vaccine policy makers. In this situation, the vaccine may continue to be recommended if the disease-prevention benefits from vaccination outweigh the risks of a newly found side effect.
Information about newly found side effects is added to the vaccine’s package insert that lists safety information. Newly found side effects also are added to the Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) for that vaccine. If serious side effects are found, and if the risks of the vaccine side effect outweigh the benefits, the recommendation to use the vaccine is withdrawn.[36]
Since everyone is unique and many injuries can play out in infinite variation, a defined injury is very unlikely to be acknowledged with some of these immunosuppressive effects.[37] Even if 3/4 of those who receive the vaccine sustain an injury from the vaccine, they could look somewhat different in each person and take considerable time to unfold like a great imitator.[38] The injuries will usually fall in the realm of non-specific, meaning they produce results like headaches, joint and body pain, fatigue, etc.[39] These are considered non-specific symptoms that could have various origins. Therefore, most vaccine injuries will be occulted, unacknowledged, and this is especially so when the injuries are delayed and take considerable time to unfold, as the nature of immunosuppressive conditions has shown.[40]
As discussed in a paper from 1999, Altered Virulence of Vaccine Strains of Measles Virus After Prolonged Replication in Human Tissue, the injury and death reported in this paper occurred months after the vaccine was administered:
However, fatal infections have been documented in immunodeficient children vaccinated with these strains (1, 12, 14, 15). The symptoms of infection occur many months after immunization, and the viruses isolated are similar to the original LA vaccine (1, 15), suggesting that in the absence of an effective host immune response, persistent infection with the vaccine strain can lead to fatal disease. Viruses isolated from these children could potentially represent virulent revertants of the original LA vaccine.[41]
The fine print of the VAERS system lays out just how little say the public claim of any vaccine injury actually has on the science, as it is all basically decided in the clinical trials:
Adverse events reported to VAERS are not necessarily side effects caused by vaccination. An adverse event is a health problem that happens after vaccination that may or may not be caused by a vaccine. These events may require further investigation. By definition, a side effect has been shown to be linked to a vaccine by scientific studies.
Before the FDA licenses (approves) a vaccine for use, the vaccine must be tested with volunteers during clinical trials to make sure it is safe and effective. Sometimes side effects show up in clinical trials. Most often side effects found in clinical trials are minor, such as possible pain at the injection site, and the vaccine is licensed because the disease-prevention benefits outweigh the risk of getting the side effect.
As part of the United States’ comprehensive vaccine safety monitoring system, VAERS detects rare vaccine adverse events, signaling to scientists that focused studies are needed to determine whether the adverse event is a side effect or if there is no medical link.[42]
As I’ve already stated, trials can be manipulated in many ways to secure a desired outcome, especially if the vaccine manufacturer wants the winning product for marketing but has immunity from prosecution or liability if anything goes wrong, which has been granted to all of those who worked on developing a COVID-19 vaccine.[43]
The earlier LYMErix vaccine developed by SmithKline & Beecham (now GlaxoSmithKline) was tested in Ukrainian children for its clinical trials before it hit the market in 1998.[44] There had been significant research going on at the time through New York Medical College (NYMC) on the genetic susceptibilities of different races and HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) groups.[45] HLA is the immune system makeup, and certain HLA types tolerate antigen better than others.[46] The LYMErix vaccine was highly immunosuppressive and this HLA group may have been the best outcome to pass the vaccine off as safe and effective.[47] What better way than to setup the clinical trials using those with the best HLA types and those at the age when their immune system was at its strongest to respond?
The other patchwork of programs the public health system uses for injury surveillance are not much better than VAERS, and no more effective at surveillance of the majority of injuries falling into the low-level neuroinflammation range.[48] V-Safe is a phone app that one has to sign up for, and yet this too treats the responses as nothing more than unsubstantiated claims. The Vaccine Safety Datalink system is described as a “collaboration between the agency and nine health systems that collects vaccine data and electronic medical records of roughly 12 million patients.”[49] However, none of today’s medical centers are setup to spot vaccine injuries, and many of the injuries that occur will not show abnormal scans or bloodwork when the problem is immunosuppressive in nature. Finally, there is BEST (also known as the Biologics Evaluation Safety Initiative), again, with such limited abilities that these will again fail to assess the safety net of the situation:
But even BEST will suffer from a data problem that is already hindering existing systems: the dearth of health insurance claims to show who got which vaccine, and when. Typically health care providers and patients submit such claims to insurers, but with the vaccines being given at no charge, often at government-sponsored events, few are bothering to file claims. Critics say that federal health officials should have predicted this glitch and prepared for it.
“The current safety surveillance system in the U.S. is dependent on health insurance claims data and electronic health records,” said Dr. Salmon. “If the vaccine data information doesn’t get into the safety system, then that safety system is unable to function.”[50]
In fact, all of these aforementioned systems of safety surveillance are set up to fail, set up to ensure that the injuries are not picked up. Even some of those half-alive public health officials with even an inkling of residual moral conscience are somewhat concerned by the lack of ability to assess safety:
“I’m concerned about this disjointed tracking system,” said Dr. Ashish K. Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health. “We knew these vaccines were coming for at least several months before they got authorized, so we really should have had a well-developed system.”
Dr. Jha and others believe that with all the public attention on the vaccines, any serious adverse reactions will likely be reported somewhere. But, they say, a more systematic approach is crucial.
“It’s critical to track, because it will help build confidence,” Dr. Jha said.
Monitoring is all the more important because the vaccines were developed and approved in record time, with the goal of inoculating most of the U.S. population as quickly as possible.
“It’s the right thing to do, but the fact of the matter is we don’t have enough information and we’re desperately in need of post-market information and monitoring,” said a high-ranking F.D.A. official, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.[51]
None of the other injuries that have been occurring for the years prior to this have been able to affect change through VAERS or any patchwork of existing programs. People are being injured in much larger numbers than is publicly understood. Such a small number of people actually report their injuries, so much goes unaccounted for, or takes time to play out. They consider claims both underreported and overreported, meaning few of the total number actually go through with a claim, while those who do are actually thought to overstate or exaggerate their injuries:
VAERS is subject to the limitations inherent in any passive surveillance system (54). Among those, underreporting (only a fraction of the total number of potentially reportable events occurring after vaccination are reported) and differential reporting (more serious events and events with shorter onset time after vaccinations are more likely to be reported than minor events) are most noticeable (44). Overreporting also occurs because certain reported adverse events might not be caused by vaccines, and some reported conditions do not meet standard diagnostic criteria. Many reported events, including serious ones, might occur coincidentally after vaccination and are not causally related to vaccination. Other potential reporting biases include increased reporting in the first few years after licensure, increased reporting of events occurring soon after vaccination, and increased reporting after publicity about a particular known or alleged type of adverse event. Individual reports might contain inaccurate or incomplete information. Because of all of these reasons as well as the absence of control groups, differentiating causal from coincidental conditions by using VAERS data alone usually is not possible. Other methodologic limitations of VAERS include the fact that it does not provide information regarding background incidence of adverse events in the general population nor does it provide information concerning the total number of doses of vaccine or vaccine combinations actually administered to patients.[52]
So far, 1524 deaths have been reported to VAERS as of March 05, 2021,[53] but yet none of them can be conclusively proven under the public health and medical standards as vaccine related, according to this article, and this would be nearly impossible anyway since, like physicians, medical examiners will not be able to discern whether any fatal reactions from septicemia or thrombocytopenia are related to the vaccine or some other infectious or non-specific cause. It is yet another gap in the data collection process which allows for injuries to continue indefinitely, and neither the public health system nor the drug firms want to go out of the way to make any connection when it might tarnish their image and profiteering.[54]
However, one can find literally dozens of articles coming out almost daily with reports of death occurring shortly after vaccination.[55][56][57][58][59] Each death could play out differently, just as each disease or adverse health effect can. The same inconclusive result applies for what the article states as “few serious problems” related to the vaccine, as it was setup to be such specific criteria that to conclusively link any vaccine to subsequent health problems, one would first have to jump through the other hurdles of reporting it to VAERS, which will screen most of them out, and any further establishing of evidence is nearly impossible using incompetent diagnostics and clinical data.[60]
Outside of that, less will be investigated through data provided to health agencies drawing on medical records or app testimony, which would indicate almost nothing of value in terms measurable adverse events that cause non-specific symptoms, such as headache, fatigue, joint-pain, mental health problems, and so on. These three organs of reporting would be seriously inadequate, [61] and all reassurances to the public that the vaccine is safe and effective,[62] equates to nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim to the public.
References & Endnotes
[1] Sejvar, James. "Vaccines and Neurologic Disease." Seminars in Neurology 31, no. 03 (2011): 338-55. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1287655.
[2] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[3] Bechter, Karl. “Virus infection as a cause of inflammation in psychiatric disorders.” Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry vol. 28 (2013): 49-60. doi:10.1159/000343967
[4] Cassisi, G, P Sarzi-Puttini, and M Cazzola. 2011. “Chronic Widespread Pain and Fibromyalgia: Could There Be Some Relationships with Infections and Vaccinations?” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22243559.
[5] FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee on LYMErix Vaccine. “LYMErix Vaccine Victim’s Stories and Related Articles.” 11AD, pp. 1–20. [Misc. written testimony] Retrieve from: https://web.archive.org/web/20030830064730/https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/briefing/3680b2_17.pdf
[6] Shah, Keerti, and Neal Nathanson. “Human Exposure To Sv40: Review And Comment.” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 103, no. 1, 1976, pp. 1–12., doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112197 Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/103/1/1/151919?redirectedFrom=fulltext, or: https://www.scribd.com/document/409584571/Human-Exposure-to-SV40-Review-and-Comment-Carcinogens-in-Vaccines
[7] Traub, E. Persistence of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus in Immune Animals and Its Relation To Immunity. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 63(6), 847-861. doi:10.1084/jem.63.6.847. (1936).
[8] Baldwin, Kelly J, and Christopher L Cummings. “Herpesvirus Infections of the Nervous System.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.)
vol. 24,5, Neuroinfectious Disease (2018): 1349-1369. doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000000661
[9] Traub, E. Can LCM virus cause lymphomatosis in mice? Archiv Fur Die Gesamte Virusforschung, 11(5), 667-682. doi:10.1007/bf01243307. (1962).
[10] Traub, E. A Filterable Virus Recovered from White Mice. Science, 81. (2099), 298-299. doi:10.1126/science.81.2099.298. (1935).
[11] Fattahi, F., & Ward, P. (2017, July 18). Understanding immunosuppression after sepsis. Retrieved February 18, 2021, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107476131730290X
[12] Traub, E. Ueber den Einfluß der latenten Choriomeningitis-Infektion auf die Entstehung der Lymphomatose bei weißen Mause [On the Influence of Latent Choriomeningitis Infection on the Development of Lymphomatosis in White Mice]. Zentrl. Bakt. I. Orig. 147 (16). 1-25. (1941). [Translated to English by A. Finnegan, 2019]
[13] Americans can't Sue Pfizer, Moderna in case of Covid-19 Vaccine side effects, Here's why. (2020, December 18). Retrieved February 15, 2021, from https://in.news.yahoo.com/americans-cant-sue-pfizer-moderna-101900890.html
[14] OpenVAERS. (2021, March 05). VAERS COVID Reports. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
[15] Stankov, G. A. (2020, June 14). Why there are no viruses. Retrieved from https://davidicke.com/2020/07/26/why-there-are-no-viruses/
[16] Cherkasova, Elena A., Ekaterina A. Korotkova, Maria L. Yakovenko, Olga E. Ivanova, Tatyana P. Eremeeva, Konstantin M. Chumakov, and Vadim I. Agol. 2002. “Long-Term Circulation of Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus That Causes Paralytic Disease.” Journal of Virology 76 (13): 6791–99. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.13.6791-6799.2002.
[17] Schaffer, F L, and C E Schwerdt. “CRYSTALLIZATION OF PURIFIED MEF-1 POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS PARTICLES.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America vol. 41,12 (1955): 1020-3. doi:10.1073/pnas.41.12.1020
[18] Wimmer, Eckard. “The test-tube synthesis of a chemical called poliovirus. The simple synthesis of a virus has far-reaching societal implications.” EMBO reports vol. 7 Spec No,Spec No (2006): S3-9. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400728
[19] Kaufman, A., MD. (2021, February 08). Homepage of Dr. Andy Kaufman, M.D. - Your health questions answered. Retrieved February 17, 2021, from https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/
[20] Salahi, S. (2021, February 03). Can covid vaccination become mandatory? Retrieved February 09, 2021, from https://www.medpagetoday.com/podcasts/trackthevax/91000
[21] Miller, S. (2021, January 19). Lockdowns and Mask Mandates do not lead to Reduced COVID Transmission Rates or Deaths, New Study Suggests. Retrieved February 15, 2021, from https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-and-mask-mandates-do-not-lead-to-reduced-covid-transmission-rates-or-deaths-new-study-suggests/
[22] Fattahi, F., & Ward, P. (2017, July 18). Understanding immunosuppression after sepsis. Retrieved February 18, 2021, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107476131730290X
[23] Cassisi, G, P Sarzi-Puttini, and M Cazzola. 2011. “Chronic Widespread Pain and Fibromyalgia: Could There Be Some Relationships with Infections and Vaccinations?” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22243559
[24] Baldwin, Kelly J, and Christopher L Cummings. “Herpesvirus Infections of the Nervous System.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) vol. 24,5, Neuroinfectious Disease (2018): 1349-1369. doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000000661
[25] Sigalos, M. (2020, December 08). The FDA says Pfizer's Covid vaccine is safe and Effective. but trial Participants warn of Intense symptoms after second shot. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/the-fda-says-pfizer-e2-80-99s-covid-vaccine-is-safe-and-effective-but-trial-participants-warn-of-intense-symptoms-after-second-shot/ar-BB1bKpro
[26] Dickson, K. “CRIMINAL CHARGE SHEETS JUNE 2017 Lobbying for a Hearing for Referral to the USDOJ for a Prosecution of the Lyme Disease Crimes.” 2017. Published at: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/47b066_01d68b1309ae457b81df1e06e6beae1e.pdf
[27] FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee on LYMErix Vaccine. “LYMErix Vaccine Victim’s Stories and Related Articles.” 11AD, pp. 1–20. [Misc. written testimony] Retrieve from: https://web.archive.org/web/20030830064730/https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/briefing/3680b2_17.pdf
[28] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[29] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[30] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get Shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html
[30] Ibid.
[31] Ibid.
[33] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system
(VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[34] Cassisi, G, P Sarzi-Puttini, and M Cazzola. 2011. “Chronic Widespread Pain and Fibromyalgia: Could There Be Some Relationships with Infections and Vaccinations?” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22243559
[35] Dickson, K. n.d. “OspA - the Greatest Imitator.” ActionLyme. TruthCures.org. Accessed July 27, 2019. http://www.actionlyme.org/Pam3Cys_Version15.htm
[36] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[37] Hoffsten, P E, and F J Dixon. “Effect of Immunosuppression on Chronic LCM Virus Infection of Mice.” The Journal of experimental medicine. The Rockefeller University Press, October 1, 1973. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4270346
[38] Dickson, K. n.d. “OspA - the Greatest Imitator.” ActionLyme. TruthCures.org. Accessed July 27, 2019. http://www.actionlyme.org/Pam3Cys_Version15.htm
[39] Fattahi, F., & Ward, P. (2017, July 18). Understanding immunosuppression after sepsis. Retrieved February 18, 2021, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107476131730290X
[40] Dickson, K. “CRIMINAL CHARGE SHEETS JUNE 2017 Lobbying for a Hearing for Referral to the USDOJ for a Prosecution of the Lyme Disease Crimes.” 2017. Published at: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/47b066_01d68b1309ae457b81df1e06e6beae1e.pdf
[41] Valsamakis, A et al. “Altered virulence of vaccine strains of measles virus after prolonged replication in human tissue.” Journal of virology vol. 73,10 (1999): 8791-7. doi:10.1128/JVI.73.10.8791-8797.1999
[42] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[43] Americans can't Sue Pfizer, Moderna in case of Covid-19 Vaccine side effects, Here's why. (2020, December 18). Retrieved February 15, 2021, from https://in.news.yahoo.com/americans-cant-sue-pfizer-moderna-101900890.html
[44] Dickson, K. “CRIMINAL CHARGE SHEETS JUNE 2017 Lobbying for a Hearing for Referral to the USDOJ for a Prosecution of the Lyme Disease Crimes.” 2017. Published at: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/47b066_01d68b1309ae457b81df1e06e6beae1e.pdf
[45] Dickson, K. “Mysterious Russian (Defectors?) Scientists at New York Medical College Study the Cyst or Spheroplast Form of Spirochetes as Well as Human Racial Diseases Susceptibilities.” ACTIONLyme, ACTIONLyme, http://www.actionlyme.org/BOGUS_RUSSIAN_NYMC_ARTICLES.htm
[46] Begovich, A B et al. “Genetic variability and linkage disequilibrium within the HLA-DP region: analysis of 15 different populations.” Tissue antigens vol. 57,5 (2001): 424-39. doi:10.1034/j.1399-0039.2001.057005424.x
[47] Marks, Donald H. 2011. “Neurological Complications of Vaccination with Outer Surface Protein A (OspA).” International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine. IOS Press. January 1, 2011. https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-risk-and-safety-in-medicine/jrs527
[48] Bechter, Karl. “Virus infection as a cause of inflammation in psychiatric disorders.” Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry vol. 28 (2013): 49-60. doi:10.1159/000343967
[49] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get Shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html
[50] Ibid.
[51] Ibid.
[52] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[53] OpenVAERS. (2021, March 05). VAERS COVID Reports. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
[54] Hunter, Philip. “Is Political Correctness Damaging Science? Peer Pressure and Mainstream Thinking May Discourage Novelty and Innovation.” EMBO reports. U.S. National Library of Medicine, May 2005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1299305
[55] example 1 : D'Ambrosio, A. (2021, January 27). Officials investigate physician's death after covid vaccination. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/90917
[56] example 2: Hatch, H. (2021, March 12). Utah woman, 39, dies 4 days after 2nd dose of COVID-19 Vaccine; Autopsy ordered. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/utah-woman-39-dies-4-days-after-2nd-does-of-covid-19-vaccine-autopsy-ordered?fbclid=IwAR2-jW9X6sXfgczKgIuXOX3Ae8Bk-Ilhr5DDBXCBLE1DA2UwR5KzpOLfflA
[57] example 3: Li, D., & Britton, B. (2021, February 05). Virginia woman dies shortly after COVID Vaccination, though no link has been found. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/virginia-woman-dies-shortly-after-receiving-coronavirus-vaccine-n1256880
[58] example 4: Woods, A. (2021, January 15). 23 die in Norway after receiving Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine: Officials. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://nypost.com/2021/01/15/23-die-in-norway-after-receiving-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine/
[59] example 5: Majumder, B. (2021, February 13). Tennessee Doctor Dies Weeks After Receiving 2nd Covid-19 Vaccine Dose; Cause of Death Unknown. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.ibtimes.sg/tennessee-doctor-dies-weeks-after-receiving-2nd-covid-19-vaccine-dose-cause-death-unknown-55557
[60] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[61] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get Shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html
[62] Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna's "95% Effective" Vaccine-Let's be cautious and first see the full data. (2020, December 22). Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/11/26/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-lets-be-cautious-and-first-see-the-full-data/