Public Health Politics and Propaganda: The Sociopolitical Offensives of the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout That Trample Over Safety
By: A. W. Finnegan
The American public health system is now utilizing misleading statistical data to shape public perception on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines a result of the State Department's recent billion-dollar campaign to fight vaccine hesitancy. These political motivations have brazened disregard for public safety and informed consent.
A recent update by the CDC on the relationship between vaccine status and COVID-19 reported to promote vaccine benefits and safety profile is seriously misleading to the public by implying that getting a COVID-19 vaccine is the pathway to health and public safety in the age of COVID-19. [1] The picture painted by this data is inherently flawed and inconclusive as to paint a misleading picture to the public, who is relying on the public health system for matters of public health and their safety relevant to the situation, and it is being promoted by media outlets to shape public perception that falsely correlates safety with getting the vaccine. [2]
A recent update by the CDC on the relationship between vaccine status and COVID-19 reported to promote vaccine benefits and safety profile is seriously misleading to the public by implying that getting a COVID-19 vaccine is the pathway to health and public safety in the age of COVID-19. [1] The picture painted by this data is inherently flawed and inconclusive as to paint a misleading picture to the public, who is relying on the public health system for matters of public health and their safety relevant to the situation, and it is being promoted by media outlets to shape public perception that falsely correlates safety with getting the vaccine. [2]
This data indirectly misleads the public to conclude that getting the vaccine is going to greatly reduce illness, injury, and death versus those who do not, and it does this by playing on the public's ignorance of the nature and mechanisms of this virus, its spike protein antigens, and the variability in which it causes disease. [3]
It also fails to address the further complexity that the vaccine is changing the course of disease and its expression to be more neurotropic and exert its effects on the central nervous system rather than the respiratory system. [4] There is substantial evidence that speaks to this, and the nature in which it plays out could be so various as to be considered not relative to infection even if it is. [5]
It also fails to address the further complexity that the vaccine is changing the course of disease and its expression to be more neurotropic and exert its effects on the central nervous system rather than the respiratory system. [4] There is substantial evidence that speaks to this, and the nature in which it plays out could be so various as to be considered not relative to infection even if it is. [5]
The pressure on the public by the state department to get the vaccine and stop questioning its safety profile is without a doubt politically-motivated and this is demonstrable by the State department's appropriation of $1.5 billion dollars in funding spent to fight vaccine hesitancy. [6]
By its own definition, the push is done through state propaganda to promote a desired political agenda. [7] Its only aim is to make the public unquestionably compliant and accepting of vaccines, even if serious unforeseen side effects were to surface during its operation that might genuinely warrant one to hesitate in getting vaccinated. It is setup to propagandize vaccine benefit and silence or downplay any possible risk or adverse event which logically warrant people to use caution, it does not consider the possibility that being cautious or hesitant might actually turn out to be well-warranted and its promotion might endanger the safety of the public. Its only purpose was to downplay health risks and fight vaccine hesitancy in a sociopolitical offensive. [8]
The CDC and state department using this data in this way is misleading and plays on the public's ignorance of so many factors and elements relevant to the variability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its interrelationship with COVID-19 vaccines as to be grossly negligent of public safety in a way that can only be described as reckless and in contrast to the ethics of proper informed consent motivated and done intentionally for political purposes. [9]
These are vaccines that were rushed into production with many breaches of safety and inadequate time for testing and assessments on safety. The clinical studies have inherent weakness and cannot measure any possible long-term effects many years down the line, even more immediate long-term effects that could see an onset within 3-4 years, such as the invariably fatal prion diseases, with a potential already identified. [10] [11]
Not to mention, many serious neurodegenerative diseases start out with non-specific symptoms that fall in the range of what they consider normal reactions to the vaccine, and follow a cyclical pattern of relapsing and remitting, progressively getting worse as the years pass. This author's chronic health problems following a tick-bite started out the same way, a flu-like illness that relapses and remits. But all they had to do was conclude that the benefit reflected in the clinical data outweighed the risk for Emergency Use Authorization, while the vaccine manufacturers and pharmaceutical giants involved were protected from any liability granted by the State Departments. [12]
In a followup paper, I will show that vaccine adverse events are also likely to have unusual presentations with infinite variation making it totally incompatible with monitoring systems currently used to assess public safety. It could be described as a brazen disregard for safety by what was supposed to be responsible and accountable health officials, science community, and pharmaceutical giants, and this is far from the case. [13]
The recent data to include vaccine status by the CDC plays on the public's ignorance of the large numbers of harm and death being reported through VAERS following the vaccine, [14] with an inadequate monitoring system for proper assessment of safety and thus breeches National Security on levels that have catastrophic potential. These issues are not disclosed in public relations efforts by the public health agencies to promote COVID-19 vaccines. [15] All reports sent through these channels are treated as unsubstantiated claims that are not proof of anything until they look into it with follow-up studies, but in order to even warrant that kind of attention, the same adverse event has to play out in unusually large numbers making it nearly impossible for anything that has a highly variable disease expression. [16]
Knowing the variability and diversity of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and how it can reactivate dormant viruses like Epstein-Barr Virus {EBV), [17] bringing on a myriad of other secondary infections like those seen in infectious respiratory catarrh, [18] a similar phenomenon could be expected with the COVID-19 vaccine utilizing its most problematic components, the spike protein antigens, which have been proven to suppress the immune system and thus reactivate dormant viruses which bring on other diseases and variability of disease expression. [19]
That means, even if 90% of the population who received a vaccine had adverse events and reported them through VAERS, they would be very likely to play out differently in each person, and therefore they would all be treated as unsubstantiated claims attributed to other causes, and it seems to reflect what is taking place in reality. [20] Even if they took the VAERS reports seriously and followed up with honest studies and found definitive correlations to the vaccine, the public health agencies could override it with the superseding authoritative decision to say that they think the benefit outweighs the risk, and thus serves as an additional loophole to keep profitable vaccines on the market despite considerable harm and injury. [21]
Therefore, it would be a likelihood that adverse events would be extremely variable in how they present and unfold in each recipient and it is not compatible with how the VAERS and similar reporting systems are setup if unusual presentations of their effects are common and turn out to be in high variation as is already beginning to show. [22] [23]
The recent changes in data to include vaccine status in attempt to fight vaccine hesitancy plays on the public's ignorance of the fact that 80% of the population will be asymptomatic anyway and that large portion of people were exposing themselves to unnecesary risk in getting the vaccine, [24] since it also brings on the chronic incapacitating outcomes seen in long-COVID due to the spike protein's ability to reactivate latent herpesviruses. [25] [26] It is the state of immunosuppression brought about by the spike proteins alone, and the subsequent reactivation of dormant viruses like those in the herpesvirus family is what the majority of the condition of any post-infection syndrome consists of, [27] and the herpesviruses have already been implicated in diverse and systemic chronic diseases resulting from the immunosuppression implicated in vaccines, as one researcher pointed out:
As more patients are becoming therapeutically immunosuppressed, human herpesvirus infections are increasingly common. Historically, infections with human herpesviruses were described as temporal lobe encephalitis caused by herpes simplex virus type 1 or type 2. More recently, however, additional pathogens, such as varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and human herpesvirus 6 have been identified to cause serious neurologic infections. [28]
The data and public relations approach by the public health agencies take advantage of the factors involved in the specific set of guidelines to determine whether an individual meets the criteria to warrant further testing to confirm the diagnosis of COVID-19, and this is further complicated by the vaccine's interference with the course of infection to such an extent that SARS-CoV-2 infection may not even be suspected in those vaccinated who experience illness or death differing from the respiratory disease labelled COVID-19, as is reflected in the VAERS reports, [29] cutting the numbers of those actually harmed by SARS-CoV-2 to a much smaller margin to not be adequately represented in the data, done however, specifically for political purposes of promoting the vaccine and fighting vaccine hesitancy for the State department. [30]
The details left out of this data could prove far more relevant than those included because the public health system does not employ competent surveillance capabilities to adequately demonstrate that there is unquestionable safety or reduction of infection with SARS-CoV-2 symmetrical to getting the vaccine. [31] It fails to mention that the respiratory disease is such a miniscule portion of cases as to make the need to vaccinate most of the population unnecessary and does not present a realistic view of the overall picture where up to 80% are asymptomatic anyway. [32] It just goes to show how data can be cleverly presented and manipulated to take advantage of the ignorance of the public for political purposes where safety is not the primary concern. [33]
The data presented by the CDC to include vaccine status does not necessarily correlate to less disease and death if the vaccination changes the course of disease to cause death or illness in a different manner than respiratory distress and pneumonia and thus will not be diagnosed as COVID-19 or vaccine-related even if it is relevant to SARS-CoV-2, as they consider COVID-19 a specific entity of disease distinct from SARS-CoV-2. [34]
The new data and its inclusion of vaccine status also plays on the public's ignorance of the unreliability of the diagnostic testing used in detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 only looking at sample specimens from the respiratory tract using nasal and oropharyngeal swabs proven unreliable and flawed for viruses with neurotropic potential. [35] That is to say, an active infection with SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination is very likely to bypass the respiratory fluids and taking to areas like the nasal turbinates where the swabs cannot isolate from, [36] while also taking to other systems in the body like the central nervous system, brain, and organs, [37] changing the symptoms of disease to be different from the criteria used to suspect a case of COVID-19 by physicians. [38]
Therefore, someone who develops a life-threatening disease or injury from SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination could look quite different than the respiratory disease, such as a central nervous system damage, sudden stroke, thrombocytopenia, heart attack, aneurysm, and so on. Such fatalities would not be included in the data as deaths occurring from SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination or listed as an effect of the vaccine itself, even if they were, and this is once again reflected in the VAERS reports. [39]
The data reflective of cases and deaths relevant to the virus by vaccination status misleads the public to conclude that one is safer from illness, injury, and death if they get the vaccine versus those who do not. [40] This could very-well turn out not to be the case and the complicated nature of SARS-CoV-2 disease variability and expression speaks to the non-uniformity of illness and death related to the virus and by extension, the vaccine. [41] [42]
Furthermore, the addition of a completely new vaccine rushed into production within a year of its construction to combat a virus that is little understood, adds exponentially more complication and complexity to the accuracy of concluding the vaccine is safe and effective. Even CNN has reported headlines like Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be 'colossally stupid,' acknowledging the brazened recklessness involved. [43]
Recent studies on the unique and oftentimes unusual presentation of health problems related to the vaccine speak to both adverse events from vaccination and infections with SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination to be so various and unique as to be gravely miscalculated and inconclusive as to its overall safety. [44]
There is an additional danger to public safety now that fighting vaccine hesitancy has officially become politically-charged by the State department with over a billion dollars in funding. [45] That means there is a concerted effort to downplay adverse events and all matters that speak against its safety which cause one to hesitate. [46] This will send a message to the medical and science establishment to do everything possible to silence and cover for the problems that arise in the process of completely new vaccines that should have been held to rigorous standards and scrutiny. Safety has already taken a backseat in other areas of the pandemic, where politics and profit take the priority and any attempts to call out mismanagement is met with persecution. [47]
Politically charging the vaccine rollout will come at the expense of public safety, and this is already reflected in the admission that the monitoring system is incompetent, [48] while reports of death and serious adverse events are flooding the VAERS system and its left virtually ignored. [49]
The sudden overwhelming spike in VAERS reports reporting death or injury after getting the COVID-19 vaccine being so significantly high compared to all other previous years and vaccines, with the underreporting already inherent in the VAERS monitoring system, speaks to the actual numbers of adverse events resulting in significant injury or death following vaccination are far higher than what is actually reported, and the number reported is already high enough. [50]
General sampling of my own social circles reflect this, because in all instances of adverse events and suspected adverse events described to me through personal testimony, none had filed a VAERS report, reflecting the reality that VAERS reports are vastly underreported. There was also testimony relayed to me about events of death related to the vaccine conclusively demonstrated failing to report it and commit it to paper because of the political climate surrounding vaccines, which adds another element of complexity to the unreliability of the current assessment of safety, and could impact safety with grave consequences.
This is even more threatening if these same factors were present in the data on clinical trials that allowed for it to be rushed onto the market within a year of its construction. The political climate of this vaccine and its rollout is brazen and dangerous. Such vast underreporting to VAERS and surveillance overall could suggest actual numbers of serious injury or death could potentially even compete with the numbers related to COVID-19 disease-related death and injury to the virus itself.
Moreover, because of the unique manner in which each vaccine injury can play out, many deaths and injuries resulting from the vaccine or post-vaccination infection with SARS-CoV-2 could significantly deviate from the standard definition of COVID-19 to such an extent that further suspicion to look for a possible relation to either vaccine injury or death from SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination may not even be considered, especially in the dangerous political climate we see before us. [51] [52]
Therefore, the flaws inherent in monitoring systems for COVID-19 surveillance overlapping with the complicated nature of vaccine adverse events and the disease expression of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections and post-vaccinal injury speaks to data that is so limited in scope and accuracy as to be not only inconclusive, [53] but misleading proof to demonstrate a desired result, meaning it is willing to employ fraud and dishonesty to favor politics, prestige, and profiteering at the expense of health and safety. [54]
Having the data only reflect outcomes of severe pneumonia or respiratory expression of COVID-19 and the failure to properly assess the nature and course of disease after vaccination misleads the public on public safety relevant to the vaccine and could even potentially put them more at risk for harm by encouraging vaccination than not because of all the factors not assessed and the failure to disclose the extenuating factors that make it unreliable.
By keeping the data focused on only a limited and specific picture of disease expression by SARS-CoV-2, they put an incomplete and misleading conclusion forward to convince the public that receiving a COVID-19 vaccine is symmetrical to safety and good health.
They fail to disclose that such measures are only looking at specific angles of SARS-CoV-2 that were typical in hospitalizations when the vaccine was not yet in use.
They fail to disclose that the pneumonia-like expression is not the only expression. [55]
They fail to disclose that vaccines can often change the course of disease to be different than those included in the guidelines for suspecting, testing, and diagnosing COVID-19. [56]
They fail to inform the public of the unusually high numbers of reports of adverse events and death reported through VAERS and how they are not able to assess the role the vaccine or post-vaccination virus infection played in the outcome. [57] [58]
They fail to assess the fact that there is no uniform expression of SARS-CoV-2 so therefore the VAERS reporting system guidelines for establishing vaccine injury or post-vaccination infection would be left uninvestigated by proxy, because it is setup to only look for the same event in unusually large numbers. Injuries to this vaccine would also play out in a similar variability and the incompetence of the data presented is a gross negligence of public safety and should be held liable. [59] [60]
A similar gross negligence for public safety in favor of political agendas, prestige, or profit-driven motivations, is also reflected in the treatment given to many in medical or public health arenas who are speaking up about other breaches of safety are being treated with threats, job loss, and intimidation of witnesses that attempt to call attention to breaches of safety by those involved in the COVID-19 response through gross negligence or mismanagement in hospitals and large special interest groups centered around profit, evading accountability and responsibility for safety. [61]
We can expect nothing less from the pharmaceutical giants in a competitive race to secure lucrative contracts for the COVID-19 vaccine. The producer of today's mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer, is no stranger to criminal methodologies like fraud, in 2009, a release from the Justice Department reads, Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing. It states:
WASHINGTON – American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today. [62]
In 2013, another one of today's COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, Johnson & Johnson, was cited in another criminal matter, Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations Allegations Include Off-label Marketing and Kickbacks to Doctors and Pharmacists. It reads:
WASHINGTON - Global health care giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its subsidiaries will pay more than $2.2 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from allegations relating to the prescription drugs Risperdal, Invega and Natrecor, including promotion for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and payment of kickbacks to physicians and to the nation’s largest long-term care pharmacy provider. The global resolution is one of the largest health care fraud settlements in U.S. history, including criminal fines and forfeiture totaling $485 million and civil settlements with the federal government and states totaling $1.72 billion. [63]
In 2003, AstraZeneca, who is now producing one of the major COVID-19 vaccines in Europe, was involved in criminal matters of medicare fraud, A New York Times article reads, AstraZeneca pleads guilty in cancer medicine scheme, it says:
AstraZeneca, the large pharmaceutical company, pleaded guilty today to a felony charge of health care fraud and agreed to pay $355 million to settle criminal and civil accusations that it engaged in a nationwide scheme to illegally market a prostate cancer drug. [64]
As if that were not enough, the public health official leading the fight against the COVID-19 crisis, Anthony Fauci, has been found to have lied under oath about the funding of Gain-of-Function research at the Wuhan lab, and Senator Rand Paul (R) is now pursuing a criminal investigation and prosecution of Anthony Fauci for lying under oath and to the former President about the matter. [65] Fauci is the public figure promoting the COVID-19 vaccine, telling us to trust him and the public health system and the pharmaceutical giants, now shown to be dishonest and willing to lie under oath to achieve political motivations. [66]
The public put its trust in the public health officials thinking their safety is considered and the public is agreeing to get these new COVID-19 vaccines under the assumption that none of what I have laid out in this paper exists, that they are given transparency and honesty, when in fact they are being kept in the dark about extremely serious elements that could cost them their life or health and well-being, through forms of dishonesty and fraud that selectively present data and lie by omission, which technically is fraud, and it is done not in the interest of public health and safety but to achieve political end points. [67]
The current appropriation by the state department of $1.5 billion dollars to fight vaccine hesitancy tells us that the current assessment and approach to vaccine safety is politically motivated in favor of vaccines and will use deception to promote the COVID-19 vaccines at the expense of safety. [68]
Through lying by omission, they fail to disclose very relevant breaches of security to safety and the inconclusive nature in which safety can even be addressed. It needs to be remembered that lying by omission to speak to a desired end is still lying, and when it has proven itself motivated by political agendas and the use of clever dishonesty to accomplish its objectives, it is a case of the public health system using fraud and dishonesty to accomplish political objectives by corporations with criminal backgrounds and public figures like Anthony Fauci willing to lie under oath and to the President, which shows criminal responsibility. [69]
Bad habits and criminal behaviors do not resolve on their own. When left to fester, they become more ingrained and habitual, and although the truth of what is taking place is concealed from most of the public through clever tactics and manipulation of data, this author bears witness to the harm and injury being done by the pharmaceutical firms and the public health system. These are crimes of the highest order and it is my hope that any of those involved in the public health system, medical and science community, who see the brazen disregard for safety and human rights, will take the noble path for the sake of humanity and testify to what has been witnessed. History is once again repeating itself. [70]
References & Endnotes
[1] Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2021, September 16). Monitoring incidence of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, by vaccination status - 13 U.S. jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e1.htm?s_cid=mm7037e1_w
[2] Putka, S. (2021, October 19). CDC now reports COVID cases and deaths by Vax status. Medical News. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from: ttps://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/95119
[3] Chen L, Zheng S. Understand variability of COVID-19 through population and tissue variations in expression of SARS-CoV-2 host genes. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020;21:100443. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100443. Epub 2020 Oct 12. PMID: 33072849; PMCID: PMC7550072.
[4] Zhou D, Chan JF, Zhou B, Zhou R, Li S, Shan S, Liu L, Zhang AJ, Chen SJ, Chan CC, Xu H, Poon VK, Yuan S, Li C, Chik KK, Chan CC, Cao J, Chan CY, Kwan KY, Du Z, Lau TT, Zhang Q, Zhou J, To KK, Zhang L, Ho DD, Yuen KY, Chen Z. Robust SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasal turbinates after treatment with systemic neutralizing antibodies. Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Apr 14;29(4):551-563.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 25. PMID: 33657424; PMCID: PMC7904446
[5] Yachou Y, El Idrissi A, Belapasov V, Ait Benali S. Neuroinvasion, neurotropic, and neuroinflammatory events of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients. Neurol Sci. 2020 Oct;41(10):2657-2669. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04575-3. Epub 2020 Jul 28. PMID: 32725449; PMCID: PMC7385206.
[6] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine hesitancy is worth more than $1 billion, Biden Administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says | Here & Now. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/03/15/vaccine-hesitancy-biden.
[7] Bernays, E. (2005). Propaganda. Ig Publishing.
[8] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine hesitancy is worth more than $1 billion, Biden Administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says | Here & Now. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/03/15/vaccine-hesitancy-biden
[9] Vazquez, C. (2021, April 19). Fighting vaccine hesitancy is next key battle of covid-19 pandemic. WPLG. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.local10.com/news/local/2021/04/19/fighting-vaccine-hesitancy-is-next-key-battle-of-covid-19-pandemic/.
[10] King OD, Gitler AD, Shorter J. The tip of the iceberg: RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in neurodegenerative disease. Brain Res. 2012 Jun 26;1462:61-80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.016. Epub 2012 Jan 21. PMID: 22445064; PMCID: PMC3372647.
[11] Tetz G, Tetz V. SARS-CoV-2 prion-like domains in spike proteins enable higher affinity to ACE2. Preprint. 2020
[12] Buzz Staff. (2020, December 18). Americans can't Sue Pfizer, Moderna in case of covid-19 vaccine side effects, here's why. News18. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/americans-cant-sue-pfizer-moderna-in-case-of-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-heres-why-3190154.html.
[13] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html.
[14] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID vaccine adverse event reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://openvaers.com/covid-data.
[15] Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2021, September 16). Monitoring incidence of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, by vaccination status - 13 U.S. jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e1.htm?s_cid=mm7037e1_w.
[16] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[17] Solomay TV, Semenenko TA, Filatov NN, Vedunova SL, Lavrov VF, Smirnova DI, Gracheva AV, Faizuloev EB. [Reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus (Herpesviridae: Lymphocryptovirus, HHV-4) infection during COVID-19: epidemiological features]. Vopr Virusol. 2021 May 15;66(2):152-161. Russian. doi: 10.36233/0507-4088-40. PMID: 33993685.
[18] Traub, E. & K. Beller. Stand und Aussichten der Erforschung des ansteckenden Katarrhs der Luftwege beim Pferd. [The Position and Outlook in Research on Infectious Respiratory Catarrh of the Horse]. Z. Veterinark, 53: 88-97. (1941). [Translated to English by A. Finnegan, 2019]
[19] Chen J, Dai L, Barrett L, James J, Plaisance-Bonstaff K, Post SR, Qin Z. SARS-CoV-2 proteins and anti-COVID-19 drugs induce lytic reactivation of an oncogenic virus. Commun Biol. 2021 Jun 3;4(1):682. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02220-z. PMID: 34083759; PMCID: PMC8175744.
[20] The Vaccine Report. (2021, April 14). Informed consent matters reports "frontline workers testimonies & VAERS reports". The Vaccine Report. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://vaccinereport.org/informed-consent-matters-reports-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/.
[21] Person, & Erman, M. (2021, October 23). FDA says benefits outweigh risks for Pfizer/biontech COVID-19 vaccine in children. Reuters. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine-shows-907-efficacy-trial-children-2021-10-22/.
[22] Khogali F, Abdelrahman R. Unusual Presentation of Acute Perimyocarditis Following SARS-COV-2 mRNA-1237 Moderna Vaccination. Cureus. 2021 Jul 23;13(7):e16590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16590. PMID: 34447639; PMCID: PMC8381757.
[23] Groth, L. (2021, February 17). Surprising side effects of the COVID vaccine, say doctors. Eat This Not That. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.eatthis.com/news-surprising-side-effects-covid-vaccine/.
[24] Ducharme, J. (2020, May 27). Study: Up to 80% of COVID-19 infections are asymptomatic. Time. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://time.com/5842669/coronavirus-asymptomatic-transmission/.
[25] Chen J, Dai L, Barrett L, James J, Plaisance-Bonstaff K, Post SR, Qin Z. SARS-CoV-2 proteins and anti-COVID-19 drugs induce lytic reactivation of an oncogenic virus. Commun Biol. 2021 Jun 3;4(1):682. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02220-z. PMID: 34083759; PMCID: PMC8175744.
[26] Rodríguez-Jiménez P., Chicharro P., Cabrera L.M. Varicella-zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;12:58–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.04.014.
[27] Long-COVID is merely a reinvented term for the immunosuppression that plagues someone initially infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and occurs in the post-infection phase. This post-infection phase is a post-sepsis syndrome and activates many other dormant viruses and brings on a continual state of chronic disease. The person will from that point be plagued by a variation of non-specific symptoms like headaches, brain fog and neurological dysfunction, chronic fatigue, joint pain, fibromyalgia, and so on. It is a result of the immune system being thrown into disarray and the dormant viruses begin to attack the body from head to toe, especially in the central nervous system and brain. It is also seen in other viruses and named respectively, post-polio syndrome, post-Ebola syndrome, post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome, it is all a post-sepsis syndrome and the spike proteins are the responsible party. What is not disclosed however, is that it is also common as a long-term side effect of vaccines, though it can sometimes be brought about in the days after the vaccine, many also come online slowly in the months and years after the vaccine and turn into a full-fledged neurodegenerative disease. However, the public health system set itself up so that those cases will never be conclusively tied to the vaccine and 99% of the injuries will be ignored.
[28] McMahon DE, Amerson E, Rosenbach M, Lipoff JB, Moustafa D, Tyagi A, Desai SR, French LE, Lim HW, Thiers BH, Hruza GJ, Blumenthal KG, Fox LP, Freeman EE. Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: A registry-based study of 414 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jul;85(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.092. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PMID: 33838206; PMCID: PMC8024548.
[29] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID vaccine adverse event reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://openvaers.com/covid-data.
[30] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine hesitancy is worth more than $1 billion, Biden Administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says | Here & Now. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/03/15/vaccine-hesitancy-biden
[31] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html.
[32] Ducharme, J. (2020, May 27). Study: Up to 80% of COVID-19 infections are asymptomatic. Time. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://time.com/5842669/coronavirus-asymptomatic-transmission/.
[33] Fiore, K. (2021, September 27). Fired covid whistleblower: Profit motive isn't working in healthcare. Medical News. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94733.
[34] Bamji, A. N. (2021, August 2). Infection with SARS-COV-2 is not the same as COVID-19. The BMJ. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1896.
[35] Winichakoon P, Chaiwarith R, Liwsrisakun C, Salee P, Goonna A, Limsukon A, Kaewpoowat Q. Negative Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs Do Not Rule Out COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5):e00297-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00297-20. PMID: 32102856; PMCID: PMC7180262
[36] Zhou D, Chan JF, Zhou B, Zhou R, Li S, Shan S, Liu L, Zhang AJ, Chen SJ, Chan CC, Xu H, Poon VK, Yuan S, Li C, Chik KK, Chan CC, Cao J, Chan CY, Kwan KY, Du Z, Lau TT, Zhang Q, Zhou J, To KK, Zhang L, Ho DD, Yuen KY, Chen Z. Robust SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasal turbinates after treatment with systemic neutralizing antibodies. Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Apr 14;29(4):551-563.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 25. PMID: 33657424; PMCID: PMC7904446
[37] Yachou Y, El Idrissi A, Belapasov V, Ait Benali S. Neuroinvasion, neurotropic, and neuroinflammatory events of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients. Neurol Sci. 2020 Oct;41(10):2657-2669. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04575-3. Epub 2020 Jul 28. PMID: 32725449; PMCID: PMC7385206.
[38] Steardo L Jr, Steardo L, Verkhratsky A. Psychiatric face of COVID-19. Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 30;10(1):261. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00949-5. PMID: 32732883; PMCID: PMC7391235.
[39] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID vaccine adverse event reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://openvaers.com/covid-data.
[40] Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2021, September 16). Monitoring incidence of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, by vaccination status - 13 U.S. jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e1.htm?s_cid=mm7037e1_w.
[41] Otto, M. A. (2020, April 22). Unusual presentations of covid-19: 'our ignorance is profound'. Medscape. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/928929.
[42] Groth, L. (2021, February 17). Surprising side effects of the COVID vaccine, say doctors. Eat This Not That. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.eatthis.com/news-surprising-side-effects-covid-vaccine/.
[43] Christensen, J. (2020, September 1). Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be 'colossally stupid'. CNN. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/01/health/eua-coronavirus-vaccine-history/index.html.
[44] Khogali F, Abdelrahman R. Unusual Presentation of Acute Perimyocarditis Following SARS-COV-2 mRNA-1237 Moderna Vaccination. Cureus. 2021 Jul 23;13(7):e16590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16590. PMID: 34447639; PMCID: PMC8381757.
[45] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine hesitancy is worth more than $1 billion, Biden Administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says | Here & Now. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/03/15/vaccine-hesitancy-biden
[46] Vazquez, C. (2021, April 19). Fighting vaccine hesitancy is next key battle of covid-19 pandemic. WPLG. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.local10.com/news/local/2021/04/19/fighting-vaccine-hesitancy-is-next-key-battle-of-covid-19-pandemic/
[47] Fiore, K. (2021, September 27). Fired covid whistleblower: Profit motive isn't working in healthcare. Medical News. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94733.
[48] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html
[49] The Vaccine Report. (2021, April 14). Informed consent matters reports "frontline workers testimonies & VAERS reports". The Vaccine Report. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://vaccinereport.org/informed-consent-matters-reports-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/.
[50] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID vaccine adverse event reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://openvaers.com/covid-data
[51] Groth, L. (2021, February 17). Surprising side effects of the COVID vaccine, say doctors. Eat This Not That. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.eatthis.com/news-surprising-side-effects-covid-vaccine/
[52] Fiore, K. (2021, September 27). Fired covid whistleblower: Profit motive isn't working in healthcare. Medical News. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94733
[53] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html
[54] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine hesitancy is worth more than $1 billion, Biden Administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says | Here & Now. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/03/15/vaccine-hesitancy-biden
[55] Yachou Y, El Idrissi A, Belapasov V, Ait Benali S. Neuroinvasion, neurotropic, and neuroinflammatory events of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients. Neurol Sci. 2020 Oct;41(10):2657-2669. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04575-3. Epub 2020 Jul 28. PMID: 32725449; PMCID: PMC7385206.
[56] Khogali F, Abdelrahman R. Unusual Presentation of Acute Perimyocarditis Following SARS-COV-2 mRNA-1237 Moderna Vaccination. Cureus. 2021 Jul 23;13(7):e16590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16590. PMID: 34447639; PMCID: PMC8381757
[57] OpenVAERS. (n.d.). VAERS COVID vaccine adverse event reports. OpenVAERS. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://openvaers.com/covid-data
[58] Kaplan, S. (2021, February 12). As millions get shots, F.D.A. struggles to get safety monitoring system running. The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/covid-vaccine-how-safe.html
[59] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Surveillance for safety After Immunization: Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) --- United STATES, 1991--2001. Retrieved February 22, 2021, fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm
[60] The Vaccine Report. (2021, April 14). Informed consent matters reports "frontline workers testimonies & VAERS reports". The Vaccine Report. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://vaccinereport.org/informed-consent-matters-reports-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/.
[61] Fiore, K. (2021, September 27). Fired covid whistleblower: Profit motive isn't working in healthcare. Medical News. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94733
[62] The United States Department of Justice. (2014, September 16). Justice Department announces largest health care fraud settlement in its history. The United States Department of Justice. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history.
[63] The United States Department of Justice. (2014, October 22). Johnson & Johnson to pay more than $2.2 billion to resolve criminal and civil investigations. The United States Department of Justice. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/johnson-johnson-pay-more-22-billion-resolve-criminal-and-civil-investigations.
[64] Petersen, M. (2003, June 21). AstraZeneca pleads guilty in cancer medicine scheme. The New York Times. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from: https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/21/business/astrazeneca-pleads-guilty-in-cancer-medicine-scheme.html
[65] Yahoo! (n.d.). Rand Paul sends criminal referral to DOJ saying Fauci lied about gain-of-function research funding. Yahoo! Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://www.yahoo.com/now/rand-paul-sends-criminal-referral-203600465.html.
[66] Eban, K. (2021, October 22). In major shift, NIH admits funding risky virus research in Wuhan. Vanity Fair. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/10/nih-admits-funding-risky-virus-research-in-wuhan.
[67] Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2021, September 16). Monitoring incidence of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, by vaccination status - 13 U.S. jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e1.htm?s_cid=mm7037e1_w
[68] WBUR. (2021, March 15). Reducing vaccine hesitancy is worth more than $1 billion, Biden Administration says. Reducing Vaccine Hesitancy Is Worth More Than $1 Billion, Biden Administration Says | Here & Now. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/03/15/vaccine-hesitancy-biden.
[69] Freiberger Haber LLP. (2021, January 13). Fraud by omission. Freiberger Haber LLP. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from https://fhnylaw.com/fraud-by-omission/.
[70] Harvard Law School Library. (n.d.). Search thousands of historical documents from the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Trials Project. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/.